Teamwork in Group Model Building1
نویسندگان
چکیده
Ongoing research in the Rockefeller College of Public Affairs and Policy is focusing on strategies for efficient and effective model building in groups. The intent is to involve a relatively large client group in the business of model formulation, not just conceptualization. Recent projects have explored strategies for accelerated group model building in the context of three public policy problem areas: the burgeoning cost and caseload of foster care in New York State, recent unexplained increases in Medicaid costs in the state of Vermont, and homelessness policy initiatives in New York City. Five roles appear to be essential to support effective group model building efforts. We term the five roles the facilitator, the modeler/reflector, the process coach, the recorder, and the gatekeeper. This article identifies the five roles, briefly overviews the three problem areas, sketches the design of the group model building efforts, outlines the apparent results, and hypothesizes principles and strategies to guide future group modeling efforts. Introduction Ongoing research in the Rockefeller College of Public Affairs and Policy is focusing on strategies for efficient and effective model building in groups. The work is related to efforts by Richmond (1987), Vennix (1990), and Morecroft (1991), and grows out of more than fifteen years of research on computer-aided, facilitated meetings.2 Group model building, as we intend the phrase, signals the intent to involve a relatively large client group in the business of model formulation, not just conceptualization. The goals are a wider resource base for insightful model 1 The authors gratefully acknowledge the contributions of John Rohrbaugh, William Steinhurst, Fred Wulczyn, Steve Andersen, Omer Jirdeh, and Sauwakon Ratanawijitrasin to this work. An earlier version appeared in the Proceedings of the 1992 International System Dynamics Conference (Richardson, Andersen, Rohrbaugh, and Steinhurst 1992). 2 See, e.g., Milter and Rohrbaugh (1985), Phillips (1988), Carper and Bresnick (1989), Rohrbaugh (1992), and Vari and Vecsenyi (1992). See Vennix et al. (1992) for further references. structure, extended group ownership of the formal model and its implications, and acceleration of the process of model building for group decision support. However, the pitfalls generated by group processes and the modeling process are formidable. It appears that no fewer than five roles or functions are essential to support effective group model building efforts. We term the five roles the facilitator, the modeler/reflector, the process coach, the recorder, and the gatekeeper. Many of us have tried to make do with one or two individuals handling these five roles (usually unconsciously), but our experiences with large modeling groups struggling with weighty problems involving diffuse knowledge suggest the roles are often best handled by separate individuals. Ideas for the importance of these roles grew out of the group process literature,3 the system dynamics literature,4 and experiences of the Decision Tectronics Group at the University at Albany,5 including work done in 1987 and ‘88 for the New York State Insurance Department on medical malpractice insurance regulatory policy.6 Recent projects at the Rockefeller College have explored strategies for accelerated group model building involving these five roles. The explorations have been carried out in the context of three public policy problem areas: the burgeoning cost and caseload of foster care in New York State, recent unexplained increases in Medicaid costs in the state of Vermont, and homelessness policy initiatives in New York City. The Five Roles The initial modeling motivation. In work done for the New York State Insurance Department in 1987 and 1988, one of the authors (Richardson) experienced some difficulties working with a fivemember model reference group in preparation for two two-day decision conferences on malpractice insurance regulatory policy. Reflecting on the difficulties, we hypothesized that they stemmed from the multiple roles the modeler was trying to 3 The earliest group process literature contains descriptions of numerous leadership roles that must be assumed in order for groups to be effective (Benne and Sheats 1948). Recent developments in the definition of facilitator roles have helped to clarify how group leadership can be provided by both internals and externals (Schein 1987, Kayser 1990, Friend and Hickling 1987). 4 Hints of multiple roles in modeling with groups appear in Stenberg (1980) and Vennix (1990). Roberts (1977) emphasizes rapid development of an initial model, maximum inhouse participation, and the importance of the role we have termed the gatekeeper. We take the "gatekeeper" term from the R&D literature (Allen 1970). 5 See Milter and Rohrbaugh (1988); Mumpower, Schuman, and Zumbolo (1988); McCartt and Rohrbaugh (1989); and Schuman and Rohrbaugh (1991). 6 See Richardson and Senge (1989) and Reagan-Cirincione et al. (1991).
منابع مشابه
The Design of the Relationship Model for Trust in Coach and Dimensions of the Process of Teamwork in the First Division League of Football Clubs in Iran
The aim of this study was to design a relationship model for trust in the coach and the dimensions of teamwork process in the first division league of Iran football clubs. The research method was descriptive-survey based on structural equation modeling that was conducted as a field experiment. The statistical population included all players of Iran football first division league in 2016 (N=450...
متن کاملInformation sharing systems and teamwork between sub-teams: a mathematical modeling perspective
Teamwork contributes to a considerable improvement in quality and quantity of the ultimate outcome. Collaboration and alliance between team members bring a substantial progress for any business. However, it is imperative to acquire an appropriate team since many factors must be considered in this regard. Team size may represent the effectiveness of a team and it is of paramount importance to de...
متن کاملInterprofessional Education: a Step towards Team Work Improvement in Cardio-Pulmonary Resuscitation
Introduction: Cardiopulmonary arrest is one of the main medical urgencies. Studies show that 20% to 30% of patients could be resuscitated via an efficient cardio-pulmonary resuscitation (CPR). Training CPR through interprofessional method could lead to improving the performance of resuscitation group. The aim of this research was to study the effects of Interprofessional training on resuscitati...
متن کاملA communication algorithm for teamwork in multi-agent environments
Using a knowledge-based approach, we derive a protocol, MACOM1, for the sequence transmission problem from one agent to a group of agents. The protocol is correct for communication media where deletion and reordering errors may occur. Furthermore, it is shown that after k rounds the agents in the group attain depth k general knowledge about the members of the group and the values of the message...
متن کاملADAPT : Abstraction Hierarchies to Succinctly Model Teamwork ( Extended
Simulation techniques, tools and environments, agent cooperation 1. ABSTRACT In this paper we present a lightweight teamwork implementation through use of abstraction hierarchies. The basis of this implementation is ADAPT, which supports Autonomous Dynamic Agent Planning for Teamwork. ADAPT’s novelty stems from how it succinctly decomposes teamwork problems into two separate planners: a task ne...
متن کاملADAPT: abstraction hierarchies to succinctly model teamwork
1. ABSTRACT In this paper we present a lightweight teamwork implementation through use of abstraction hierarchies. The basis of this implementation is ADAPT, which supports Autonomous Dynamic Agent Planning for Teamwork. ADAPT’s novelty stems from how it succinctly decomposes teamwork problems into two separate planners: a task network for the set of activities to be performed by a specific age...
متن کاملذخیره در منابع من
با ذخیره ی این منبع در منابع من، دسترسی به آن را برای استفاده های بعدی آسان تر کنید
عنوان ژورنال:
دوره شماره
صفحات -
تاریخ انتشار 1998